Reporting an incident matters. But the professional record should not end at the moment the report is submitted. If the same conduct returns, the history after the first report becomes important too.
The useful question is not only “Did I report it?” It is also: what changed afterwards, what support was requested, what response arrived, and did the problem recur? That turns a single complaint into a traceable sequence.
The TSA approach is to keep the immediate response controlled, make a concise factual record, follow up when the first step produces no meaningful change, and move to the next appropriate channel rather than repeating the same failed action indefinitely.
The aim is not paperwork for its own sake. It is to prevent a later crisis from erasing the earlier history.
This is practical educational commentary, not legal representation. Where a briefing discusses a current external event, the source reporting will be identified and linked in that edition.